Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180027190.639-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus writes:

> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?

As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
have to come up with better reasons.  Also note that most major number
changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
the project has moved to a new phase.  I don't see any such move
happening.

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?