Re: Erroneous PPC spinlock code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Reinhard Max
Тема Re: Erroneous PPC spinlock code
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311060005390.25923-100000@wotan.suse.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Erroneous PPC spinlock code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 at 13:28, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>
> > The SuSE PPC guru said that the PPC spinlock code we currently use
> > may behave erroneously on multiprocessor systems.
>
> What's his evidence for that claim?

Let's ask himself.

> The code we have is based directly on the recommendations in the PPC
> manuals, and has been tested on multi-CPU systems.

Marcus, can you explain the details, please?


cuReinhard



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Anthony W. Youngman"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM