Re: Call for port reports
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Call for port reports |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310311733440.15991-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Call for port reports (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Call for port reports
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Odd. I count ten inline functions in the backend:
> Why would only three of them fail?
I just remembered this Autoconf change:
2002-03-28 Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
* lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_INLINE): Test with a typedef return value, to avoid versions of HP C which don't
allowthat.
So there you have it. Do we want to backpatch the new autoconf test, or
define inline to empty for this particular version of this platform, or
try to do without typedef'd types? I prefer option 1.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: