Re: Need help with SGML again
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need help with SGML again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310151820490.20562-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Need help with SGML again (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need help with SGML again
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Rod Taylor writes: > Recently, I've been using Openoffice for a first cut and Conglomerate to > clean the document up. Of course, that uses a strict XML version and I > normally prefer xincludes to entity based includes. If you can find/propose/develop an XML-based setup that has the same functionality as our current setup, I wouldn't mind switching. Some things that I see as requirements are: 1. Does the HTML output look at least as good as the current output? (The default DocBook XSLT stylesheets do not, AFAIR.) 2. Is there a toolchain that can create PDFs, that actually work on our input files? (FOP does not, AFAIR; PassiveTeX is a pain to set up.) 3. Is there a (mature) toolchain to create man pages? 4. Is there a quick way to verify the validity of the entire document? 5. How does the speed of the new toolchain compare to the current one? 6. What to do about the parameter entities? 7. How hard is it to set up the toolchain? (xsltproc is pretty wide spread and would be acceptable. Java-based tools such as saxon seem like trouble.) -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: