Re: relation vs table...
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: relation vs table... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310091517330.31740-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | relation vs table... (Terrence Brannon <metaperl@urth.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Terrence Brannon writes: > I don't understand why Postgres thinks I am creating a relation _and_ I > don't know what it considers a relation to be. In the context of relational databases, relation means the same thing as table. Because of some implementation artifacts, PostgreSQL internally treats tables, views, indexes, and sequences alike to some extent and refers to all of them together as relations. So when you see an error message telling you that a relation was not found, that means PostgreSQL was looking for a table, a view, an index, or a sequence. This artificial terminology isn't ideal, but it creates few problems in practice. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: