Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310050057150.2745-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back ...
|
| Список | pgsql-committers |
Tom Lane writes: > > If it's only honored by SQL functions, then it should probably be called > > check_sql_function_bodies. > > I thought about that while I was making the patch, but decided that it > would be a very un-forward-looking name. Someday we will probably have > syntax-checking validators for plpgsql, etc. The point of this feature is to avoid failures because of forward references in SQL code. A syntax-checking validator in anything but possibly plpgsql will not even look at SQL code, so a validator for a different language will only gain pain and confusion by respecting this parameter. Perhaps it needs to different name altogether, along the lines of "do not check SQL code in functions". -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: