Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Pohl
Тема Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0309151154220.10153-100000@server1.techplant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?  (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Alexey Borzov wrote:

> Michael Pohl wrote:
>
> > As a side note, I appreciate the PgSQL community's apparent commitment to
> > avoid both FUD and overstatement of PgSQL's capabilities.
>
> If you look closely at my list, it has no overstatements. It has no
> false statements either, everything can be backed up by appropriate links.

I did not mean to imply that your list contained overstatements.  I was
making a general statement about the tone I've noticed on the PgSQL
mailing lists and web site, vs. what I've noticed in other projects.  I
apologize for not being clear.

michael


В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexey Borzov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?