Re: "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0308312103080.1119-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: "is_superuser" parameter creates inconsistencies
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > Presumably, the "is_superuser" parameter was intended to make the updating > > > of psql's prompt more accurate when SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION is used. > > > However, if the prompt is customized to include the user name (%n), then > > > the prompt changes to reflect the real superuser status, but does not > > > change the user name. I guess we need to pass "session_user" as well. > > > > Seems reasonable. IIRC the only addition needed to the server code is > > to set a flag in the variable's GUC entry. > > Is this a TODO item or something we want to address for 7.4? I'd like to address it for 7.4, but it looks a bit more difficult than it seemed at first, because session_user isn't in GUC at all, so there is no infrastructure to pass it to the client. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: