Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware

Tom Lane writes:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> SET CONSTRAINTS still does what it used to do, which is to alter the
> >> behavior of all constraints with the given name.  We should probably
> >> expand the syntax so that a particular table name can be mentioned.
>
> > Is this a TODO?
>
> Nobody objected to my statement, so I guess so ...

I just hate to see us breaking the SQL standard for no technical reason.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net