Tom Lane writes:
> Yeah. We had that discussion at some point during the 7.3 development
> cycle, and concluded we liked table-local naming for constraints better
> than the SQL spec's global constraint names.
Then why does pg_constraint store a schema OID? The comments say it's for
SQL compatibility, so where else does it need to be compatible besides
this case?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net