Re: Win32 port patches submitted
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 port patches submitted |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0301211837030.789-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Win32 port patches submitted (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Win32 port patches submitted
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck writes: > I just submitted the patches for the native Win32 port of v7.2.1 on the > patches mailing list. I'm concerned that you are adding all these *.dsp files for build process control. This is going to be a burden to maintain. Everytime someone changes an aspect of how a file is built the Windows port needs to be fixed. And since the tool that operates on these files is probably not freely available this will be difficult. I don't see a strong reason not to stick with good old configure; make; make install. You're already requiring various Unix-like tools, so you might as well require the full shell environment. A lot of the porting aspects such as substitute implemenations of the C library functions could be handled nearly for free using the existing infrastructure and this whole patch would become much less intimidating. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: