Re: psql and readline
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql and readline |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0301091619280.1613-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql and readline (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Rod Taylor wrote: > > I'd tend to switch it to store \E QUERY BUFFER in the history, and > > possibly remove the ability to use \e by itself -- or make \E FILENAME > > and \e QUERY BUFFER. > > > > Since the use of \e isn't likely to be used in a programmatic > > (automated) way, but only by users who could quickly figure it out. > > I don't think it makes sense to remove \e just to add history > functionality. I agree. Also more people would type \e than they would \E. Also they are used to having \e available. Adding the functionality to the history is useful, but we shouldn't change things too much. I currently think that if \e is typed on it's own, then \E QUERY BUFFER goes into the history. Keep the existing behaviour of \e FILENAME the same. I'd doubt that a user would type \E QUERY BUFFER themselves often (if at all). Peter -- Peter Mount peter@retep.org.uk http://www.retep.org.uk/Tel/Fax: +44 (0) 1622 749439 Mobile: +44 (0) 7903 155887 US Fax: 1 435 304 5165 US Voice: 1 435 304 5165
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: