Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers?
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers?
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0212112045070.25355-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers? "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: psql's \d commands --- end of the line for 1-character identifiers? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane writes: > How do you mean "where"? The spec says it's gotta be called > information_schema, no? What's left to decide? I was more wondering where in the source tree to put and how to install it. I would suggest the following: I have a file information_schema.sql which contains the commands to create the information schema in a user-space manner. I'd put it into backend/catalog, from there it gets installed in the same place the .bki files go, and initdb installs it into template1 near the end. Maybe someone wants to make a case for putting the information schema definitions into a bunch of separate .sql files, one for each item defined in the standard? We also have to think whether we want to magically represent the information_schema in the search path as the spec prescribes. I would suggest a "no" for that. The names of the objects in the information schema are way to obvious to put in the default namespace (pun intended for amusement). -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления