Re: move 0 behaviour
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: move 0 behaviour |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0210301928450.2006-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: move 0 behaviour (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: move 0 behaviour
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes: > So, that is why MOVE 0 goes to the end of the cursor. One idea would be > for MOVE 0 to actually move nothing, but jdbc and others need the > ability to move the end of the cursor, perhaps to then back up a certain > amount and read from there. Seems MOVE 0 is the logical way to do that. > (I can't think of another reasonable value). It would seem more logical and reasonable for MOVE 0 to do nothing and have some special syntax such as MOVE LAST to move to the end. (MOVE LAST would actually be consistent with the standard syntax FETCH LAST.) -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: