Re: COPY syntax
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY syntax |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0210171845470.928-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COPY syntax (Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: COPY syntax
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Lee Kindness writes: > Are you serious? You'd like to mess up the COPY syntax even further > for a purely grammatical reason! We already "messed up" the COPY syntax in this release to achieve better user friendliness. I do not think it's unreasonable to review this goal from a variety of angles. > A good few months ago I put formward an idea to change (well migrate > really) to "COPY TABLE" rather than "COPY" - this would allow a well > designed and thoughtout syntax for the new version while retaining old > compatibility. Well, I am the first to agree that the current syntax is not well designed, but I must admit that I don't quite see what benefit simply adding "TABLE" would have. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: