Re: orderRules() now a bad idea?

Tom Lane writes:

> I'm confused; are you saying that NAME's sort behavior is good as-is?
> If not, what would you have it do differently?

What I am primarily saying is that ordering the rule execution order
alphabetically is not a really good solution.  Consequently, I would not
go out of my way to make code changes to pursue this goal.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net