Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0209281231120.1149-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes: > Well, let's look at the common case. For proper view rules, these would > all return the right values because the UPDATE in the rule would be > returned. Is that what you mean? I guess that really depends on whether the rules are written to properly constrain the writes to the view to the set of rows visible by the view. For example, if a view v1 selects from a single table t1 constrained by a search condition, and I do UPDATE v1 SET ...; without a condition, does that affect all rows in t1? If not, then both our proposals are equivalent, if yes, then the it's the user's fault, I suppose. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: