Tom Lane dijo:
> It seems to me that DROP ONLY should set attislocal true on each child
> for which it decrements the inherit count, whether the count reaches
> zero or not. This would cause the behavior in the above case to be that
> c.f1 stays around after the second drop (but can be dropped with a third
> drop of c.f1 itself). I think this is correct, since the implication of
> DROP ONLY is that child columns are being cut loose from their parent's
> apron strings and now have independent existence.
Yes, I think it's more consistent the way you are proposing.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Acepta los honores y aplausos y perderas tu libertad"