Re: directional marks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: directional marks
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0209170056530.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: directional marks  (nngodinh@tiscali.it)
Список pgsql-hackers
nngodinh@tiscali.it writes:

> I'm speaking about directional marks that are ignored by - for instance
> - by Microsoft SQL 7.0 because they're unuseful in that position (like when
> they're in a one way text either left-to-right or right-to-left). It may
> happen that this kind of symbols are randomly inserted: for example...

To me this sounds analogous to inserting tons of <space><backspace>
sequences into a string and expecting the software to automatically figure
out that they cancel.  It would be possible, but it would probably add a
lot of overhead and it doesn't seem to be requested a lot.  The best
solution is probably to fix your data.  Unless you can point to a Unicode
standard that states that such cancellation should happen.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Bug: COPY IN doesn't test domain constraints
Следующее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.3 Beta Schema and pg_dump