Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0209101753000.3964-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
Список pgsql-general
Tom Lane dijo:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Henry's regex work is the same code that is in *BSD regex (at least
> > BSD/OS, FreeBSD, NetBSD), which I have found to be pretty slow in
> > certain complex cases,
>
> You're speaking of his *old* package (the one we currently use), no?
>
> Friedl seems to think that the current Tcl regex engine (Henry's new
> code) is the most advanced thing on the planet.

Oh, so the TODO item "replace with newer code" is not just vaporware?
Well, I won't try to compete with Spencer's code in that case.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Linux transformó mi computadora, de una `máquina para hacer cosas',
en un aparato realmente entretenido, sobre el cual cada día aprendo
algo nuevo" (Jaime Salinas)


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Eckermann
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: parsing column info
Следующее
От: "scott.marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: describe table query?