Jason Tishler writes:
> I actually recommended this (via a patch) in the past, but it was vetoed
> by you. :,) I have been post-processing "make install" ever since. I
> would be very happy if you would reconsider this position.
I remember. I'm not saying that I like this very much, but if there's
reputable precedent we might as well go along with it. OTOH, we currently
don't have a clean way to distinguish between imported and dlopen'able
DLLs in the build system, so I'm not sure how to implement this cleanly.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net