Tom Lane writes:
> > (5) is not really needed if we
> > take pg_dump's current approach of associating a language with the
> > namespace of the underlying function.
>
> Well, do you like that? It was only a quick hack to get pg_dump
> running with schemas; I'm not convinced we really want it to act
> that way.
We should probably put the languages into a schema.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net