Re: COPY syntax improvement
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY syntax improvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0206202126310.1267-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COPY syntax improvement (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes: > I thought there were complaints that the old COPY syntax just had too > many features stuffed in too many unusual places, Haven't ever seen one. This command has no precedent in other products, only years of going virtually unchanged in PostgreSQL. Changing it now and allowing countless permutations of the key words is going to be confusing, IMHO. > e.g. delimiter after > filename, COPY is the only command to use a delimiter, so this can hardly be qualified as an "unusual" place. > oids after tablename, That's because the OIDs are in said table. > binary after COPY, Which is consistent with DECLARE BINARY CURSOR. > NULL after delimiter. OK, that order should perhaps be more flexible. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: