Re: psql possible TODO

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Troy
Тема Re: psql possible TODO
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0612051539230.27353-100000@denzel.in
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql possible TODO  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: psql possible TODO  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > O.k. what about \s# ? Or something like that... Where \s is the good old
> > fashioned way, and \s# is my new fandango way?
>
> That's got a meaning already (any argument to \s is the file name to write).
>
> I suppose that if you didn't mind making the command behave
> non-orthogonally, you could have "\s" print line numbers while
> "\s file" doesn't.  Not sure if that's a good idea or not ...

Hi Tom, Josh,

Frankly, I don't care about this much, though I tend to lean _against_
numbered querys, however, it occurs to me that perhaps Josh can implement
a command line switch to turn on command line numbering. He gets what he
wants, you get what you want, and the world has a tiny bit more
functionality. It seems to me foolish to change what exists today, but
_adding_ an option seems reasonable if someone wants to impelent it.

Rgds,
Richard

-- 
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy@ScienceTools.com, http://ScienceTools.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql possible TODO
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql possible TODO