Re: Postgres unique index checking and atomic transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От scott.marlowe
Тема Re: Postgres unique index checking and atomic transactions
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0307241036120.25680-100000@css120.ihs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Postgres unique index checking and atomic transactions  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-general
On 24 Jul 2003, Greg Stark wrote:

>
> So I have to adjust a primary key by adding one to every existing record.
> Obviously this isn't a routine operation, my data model isn't that messed up.
> It's a one-time manual operation.
>
> However when I tried to do the equivalent of:
>
>   update tab set pk = pk + 1
>
> I got
>
>   ERROR:  Cannot insert a duplicate key into unique index tab_pkey
>
> Is that right? Obviously after completing the query there would be no
> duplicate keys. Is this a case where I would need deferred constraints to
> allow this? Even for immediate constraints shouldn't a single sql update be
> able to go ahead as long as it leaves things in a consistent state?

I've run into this before.  If your pks are in the range of say 1 to 1000,
then just add 50000 to them, then subtract 49999...


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Ayers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 0/1 vs true/false
Следующее
От: Mike Mascari
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres unique index checking and atomic transactions