On Tue, 20 May 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> > I'd be glad to test it, but we don't have any issues with fk deadlocks
> > since our load is 99% read, 1% write, and most of the tables with fks on
> > them only have a handful of writers, so any testing I would do would
> > probably just be the "we used it in production and it didn't die" kind of
> > testing.
>
> That's what I'm looking for mostly: that it does not have any adverse
> side-effects.
So where's that patch again? The search function of the mail archives is
broken, so I can't seem to find it.