Does dropping a column from a table mess up foreign keys?
| От | Keith F Irwin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Does dropping a column from a table mess up foreign keys? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0107201202360.6898-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Список | pgsql-general |
I'm getting the following error:
ERROR: Relation "accounts" with OID 72496 no longer exists
What I did was to drop a couple of columns using the example Bruce
provides in his book on page 264. Briefly, it's something like:
create table temp as select * from accounts;
drop table accounts;
create table accounts (etc with columns missing);
insert into accounts select <all except dropped cols> from temp;
drop table temp;
grant update,select,insert,delete on accounts to user;
And so on. I've also updated an "accounts_view" based on this table so
that the dropped columns wouldn't appear (the view being defined with an
asterisk field list).
I have lots of tables with "references accounts(id)" in them. Are these
going to be screwed up because of the drop/create above?
I even tried dumping the DB after the changes, then pg_restoring them, but
I get a message something like, Relation ACCOUNTS doesn't exist. I was
thinking that restoring the db in this way would recalculate the OIDs.
Is there some command I should do BEFORE the changes due to the fact that
other tables have contraints based on "accounts"? (Now that I think about
it, I'm amazed that I can drop a table with data dependent on it.)
Clues?
Keith
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: