Re: Operators and schemas
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Operators and schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204161831000.689-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Operators and schemas (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Operators and schemas
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fernando Nasser writes: > I agree. And for Entry level SQL'92 we are done -- only tables, views > and grants are required. The multiple schemas per user is already > an intermediate SQL feature -- for intermediate SQL'92 we would still > need domains and a character set specification. > > For SQL'99, we would have to add types, functions and triggers > (only triggers are not part of Core SQL'99, but I would not leave them out). I can hardly believe that we want to implement this just to be able to check off a few boxes on the SQL-compliance test. Once you have the ability to use a fixed list of statements in this context it should be easy to allow a more or less arbitrary list. Especially if they all start with the same key word it should be possible to parse this. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: