Re: compile bug in HEAD?
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: compile bug in HEAD? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0203302216170.683-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: compile bug in HEAD? (nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway)) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway writes: > However, it does appear that we can tweak flex for more performance > (usually at the expense of a larger generated parser). In particular, it > looks like we could use "-Cf" or "-CF". Is this a good idea? Probably. Run some performance tests if you like. It looks like -CFea might be a reasonable candidate. > While we're on the subject of minor optimizations, is there a reason why > we execute gcc with "-O2" rather than "-O3" during compilation? Mainly because everyone does it this way. Probably because it's a reasonable compromise between execution speed, compilation speed, debuggability, and compiler bugs. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: