Re: elog() proposal
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: elog() proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0202241156150.686-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: elog() proposal (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: elog() proposal
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes: > > I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name. > > Proposals then? What's been used or bandied about so far are > "REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it). > "STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague; > it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL). > "FATALALL" (also yuck). I think FATALALL is good, because it tells you exactly what is going on, namely the same as FATAL but for all sessions. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: