Re: Summary of new configuration file and data directory

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Did we come to a conclusion on this?

I had hoped the people that originally demanded this functionality would
comment in this thread.  Unless someone can provide a solution that keeps
the data in the configuration files safe without doing anything strange
during installation, the files will stay where they are.

>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> > > Can't we do both?  If the default setup is to put config files in
> > > a Postgres-specific directory, then let's make the default arrangement
> > > be that that directory is Postgres-owned, mode 700, *and* the config
> > > files are Postgres-owned and mode 600.
> >
> > The problem with this is that the PostgreSQL-specific configuration file
> > directory may be used by programs other than the server.  E.g., the ODBC
> > driver puts stuff in there.  In some future life there may be a global
> > psqlrc file or the JDBC driver may have a global properties file (don't
> > know if that just made sense).  So we'd have to make a subdirectory, say
> > "server" (or "secure" or "secret" ...).  Seems a bit ugly.
> >
> > Moreover, I don't know if we can make permission changes on directories
> > during installation (make install).  (Read "can" as:  ought to, while
> > staying within the vague confines of open-source software build system
> > standards.)  For all we know, the directory may already be there and the
> > installer told us to reuse it.
> >
> > How is the situation on the broken editors these days?  We might just want
> > to put a note on the top of each critical file
> >
> > # Make sure this file is not readable by anyone except you.
> > # If you edit it, make sure your editor does not change the permissions on
> > # this file.
> > # If in doubt, execute chmod go-a filename.
> >
> > --
> > Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net