Re: mysql-pgsql comparison

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: mysql-pgsql comparison
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0201132006040.2682-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: mysql-pgsql comparison  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> > 1. Actually run the MySQL benchmark, to see what's wrong with it.  (Note
> > that this is not the crashme test.)
>
> This would be a worthwhile thing to try, just to see if it exposes any
> PG weaknesses we didn't already know about.  I have run crashme in the
> past (not recently though); but I've never found time for their
> benchmark.

Well, I attempted to run the benchmark today, and it's not dissimilar to
crashme in the sense that a) it tends to crash, and b) it's quite useless.
It's the same single-user "run select a whole bunch of times" sort of
thing that's not really interesting anymore.  The MySQL 4.0 server was
consistently killed by the kernel during this test.  The stable
3.something version didn't quite work either because of some "unknown
errors", so I only got some tests to run.  But when was the last time
someone actually cared about the speed of alter table or drop index?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Clift
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: mysql-pgsql comparison
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Release time