Re: Licensing
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Licensing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0112061757000.619-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Licensing ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ross J. Reedstrom writes: > Yeah, a quick search on freshmet.net found TinyScheme and KSI Scheme as > candidates for an embeddable Scheme interpreter. KSI is described as > 'well documented: but the doumentation is in Russian' Several months ago I looked to do exactly what Doug is proposing now. There are a few dozen(!) freely available scheme implementations out there that claim to be embeddable, but I haven't found a single one that a) compiled cleanly, b) was documented, and c) could be used in a way that wouldn't require changing the postmaster startup code. Most scheme implementations play weird tricks with the stack for efficiency, but I don't want that kind of thing in PostgreSQL. Good luck anyway. ;-) -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: