Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0111202318300.613-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings) (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql.conf (Proposed settings)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
mlw writes: > These are just ballpark settings, I don't even know how good they are. The problem > is that server environments differ so greatly that there is no right answer. Which is why this is clearly not a solution. > I am just really concerned that the newbe PostgreSQL user will assume > the performance they see with the default settings are what they will > judge PostgreSQL. For this kind of "newbie", the kind that doesn't read the documentation, this would only make it worse, because they'd assume that by making the choice between three default configurations they've done an adequate amount of tuning. Basically, you'd exchange, "I can't find any tuning information, but it's slow" for "I did all the tuning and it's still slow". Not a good choice. The bottom line is that you *must* edit postgresql.conf in order to tune your server. If this editing is simplified it doesn't matter what the default is. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: