Re: 7.2b1 ...
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.2b1 ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0110262035280.628-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.2b1 ... ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier writes: > CVS tags have been conssitent since v7.1 ... Allow me to consider that a joke: REL7_2_BETA1 REL7_1_STABLE REL7_1_BETA3 REL7_1_BETA2 REL7_1_BETA REL7_1_2 REL7_1 So, Where is REL7_1_1? Where is REL7_1_BETA1? What does REL7_1_BETA belong to? What ever happened to beta4 thru beta6 or so, and rc1 through rc3? What is the CVS tag for 7.2b1? What release is the tag REL7_2_BETA1 for? And if there is a 7.2b1, where is 7.2a1? And do you realise that in the GNU tradition, a release 7.2b would be a beta release leading to 7.3? And I won't even start talking about the names of the ChangeLog files which are fortunately gone. All of this requires just a minute of thought and will save countless people a headache. Please. > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > > > ... is now packaged ... mirrors will pick it up soon, but if anyone wants > > > to do a quick check, its in /pub/beta ... > > > > What ever happened to 7.2beta1? > > > > Sorry, but the inconsistency in naming of releases and CVS tags (if ever > > there would be any) is driving me nuts. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: