Re: Snaptshot appears fine to me ...

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> Right now, from what I can tell, the snapshot looks great to me:
>
> postgresql# ls -lt
> total 486
> drwxrwxrwx  15 pgsql  pgsql     512 Oct 15 04:04 src
> drwxrwxrwx  43 pgsql  pgsql    1024 Oct 15 04:04 contrib
> drwxrwxrwx   4 pgsql  pgsql     512 Oct 15 04:04 doc
> drwxrwxrwx   2 pgsql  pgsql     512 Oct 15 04:04 config
> -rwxr-xr-x   1 pgsql  pgsql  249153 Oct 14 04:00 configure
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql   35886 Oct 13 04:01 configure.in
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql  132689 Oct 13 04:01 HISTORY
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql     700 Oct  2 10:21 register.txt
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql   34643 Oct  1 13:46 INSTALL
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql    3464 Sep 17 19:00 GNUmakefile.in
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql     566 Aug 26 18:28 aclocal.m4
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql    1928 May 10 21:46 README
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql    1432 Feb  9  2001 Makefile
> -rw-r--r--   1 pgsql  pgsql    1189 Jan 24  2001 COPYRIGHT
>
> All fresh dates ...

The problem was that some of the (sub-)tarballs had old dates, not what
happened to the files within.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter