Re: syslog by default?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: syslog by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0109111455400.680-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | syslog by default? (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: syslog by default?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > There was a discussion about --enable-syslog by default. What was the > consensus? I think this is a good one. It would be a good one if we make the blind assumption that syslog() exists on all platforms. That is possible, but not guaranteed. (BeOS, QNX, Cygwin?) The alternative suggestion to turn it off if syslog() is not found makes me wary. These schemes have invariably lead to problems in the past. Recall libpq++ being missed because of false test results, readline support mysteriously disappearing and nobody noticing until Mandrake had shipped their CDs. There are possible scenarios where syslog support could be missed by configure, such as when you need some compat or bsd library. An alternative scheme I wanted to implement for readline is --enable-foo => force feature to be used --disable-foo => force feature not to be used <nothing> => use feature if available but I'm afraid that this would create more confusion than it's worth because a prudent user would specify --enable-foo anyway. I'd rather type a few more things and get predictable behavior from configure rather than relying on it to pick the features for me. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: