Re: Status of ipcclean

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Status of ipcclean
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0108281736300.699-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Status of ipcclean  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> I believe that ipcclean is no longer needed for preparing to start a new
> postmaster.  It might possibly be useful if you wanted to clean up after
> a dead postmaster that you did *not* intend to restart.
>
> However, given the lack of portability and lack of robustness of the
> script (including inability to deal with multiple-postmaster
> situations), I think I'd vote for removing it altogether.

Can other people voice their opinions what to do with ipcclean?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruno Mattarollo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.1.3, IRIX 6.5 and gcc
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.1.3, IRIX 6.5 and gcc