Re: A couple items on TODO
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A couple items on TODO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0108232053430.677-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A couple items on TODO (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > AFAIR, elog at NOTICE or DEBUG level isn't really supposed to have any > side-effects. The bigger issue is that you have to be careful about > using it in certain places, mainly during startup or for reporting > communication errors. (send failure -> elog -> tries to send message to > client -> send failure -> elog -> trouble) It's especially postmaster.c and the related subroutines elsewhere that I'm not happy about. The postmaster would really need a way to report an error to the log and continue in its merry ways. This could probably be encapsulated in elog() by setting a flag variable "I'm the postmaster" -- might even exit already. Note: In my experience, the previous suggestion to return to the postmaster main loop on error would not really be useful. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: