Re: [PATCHES] Re: PostGIS spatial extensions
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Re: PostGIS spatial extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0108151947460.677-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Brook Milligan writes: > Doesn't this discussion indicate that the time is fast approaching, if > not already past, for some type of system for handling installation of > 3rd party software? Yes. > - Definition and implementation of the interface to be provided for > extensions. Presumably, this would involve defining a well-designed > set of public header files and associated libraries at the right > level of granularity. This is not going to happen. One of the features of the extensibility is that you can extend pretty much everything. > - Definition and implementation of a consistent extension management > system for retrieving, compiling, and installing extensions. Retrieving and compiling are solved problems. I don't want us to get involved in creating build tools. As for installing the extensions into the server, there's clearly some room for improvement. I was just thinking that we could have a simple package management system where any number of functions, tables, types, etc. could belong to a package and then you can remove everything with one command. I think this is what SQL might mean with modules. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: