Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0108091719270.698-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions (Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Paul Ramsey writes: > Otherwise problems, just the problem of our being there first: most > people won't be sufficiently loyal to the BSD licence to want to > reimplement the whole OpenGIS spec when there's already an open source > version around. That's exactly my point. We at PostgreSQL have confirmed many times that the BSD license is not just a historical accident but a desired feature of our product. I think we should not compromise that by effectively endorsing and supporting a partial replacement for our product that does not meet these standards. > This is > something which probably should be hashed out in general. What > constitues the core product and (just as important) what are the > packaging standards for non-core modules which will allow them to > be added to the core with a minimum of effort (CPAN is an excellent > example). Good points. I think before long we need some sort of extension repository as well. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: