Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107201825440.713-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Lamar Owen writes: > The RPM additions are: > 56 contrib-intarray.tar.gz > 4 file-lists.tar.gz > 8 migration-scripts.tar.gz No tar or gz files in CVS. > 4 postgresql-7.1.plperl.patch > 4 postgresql-7.1.s390x.patch No patches in CVS. > 4 postgresql-bashprofile Not sure what's in there exactly, so I can't comment. > 4 postgresql-dump.1.gz What's wrong with pg_dump? > 8 postgresql.init We already have one of those. > 4 rh-pgdump.sh See above. > 8 rpm-pgsql-7.1.patch See above. See, if we want to get into the packaging business for real, then there should not be any patches or extra programs or extra features distributed. Fixes should be incorporated, not archived. Then again, there are at least six other packaging efforts out there which come with yet another set of patches and what not so I see this getting messy. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: