Re: pg_depend
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_depend |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107172158040.678-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_depend (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_depend
Re: pg_depend Re: pg_depend |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > The alternative to pg_depend is to do a brute force scan of all the > system catalogs looking for dependent objects. In that case, you'd > know what you are looking at, but if we extract the dependencies as > a separate table, I don't see how you'd know without being told. The former is what I'm advocating. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: