Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107120046520.679-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian writes: > > "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote: > > >> and it was never submitted to us a a patch. > > > > > >According to the README it was. Oliver, could you comment on this please? > > > > It was, a couple of months back. Peter made some criticism of its use of > > autoconf, which I have changed. I have not resubmitted the patch because > > the core team seemed to think it was not sufficiently portable. If people > > want to include it in the main release, I will resubmit a revised patch. > > I think our current idea is to have people run local ident servers to > handle this. We don't have any OS-specific stuff in pg_hba.conf and I > am not sure if we want to add that complexity. What do others think? This is not any less "specific" than SSL or Kerberos. Note that opening a TCP/IP socket already opens a theoretical hole to the world. Unix domain is much safer. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: