Re: encode in base code
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: encode in base code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0107031734290.677-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: encode in base code (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Marko Kreen writes: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Would you mind changing the copyright to match the rest of the source? > > Ok, I needed the BSD-style for separate distribution. > > Should it be only line: > > Copyright (c) 2001 PostgreSQL Global Development Group You can keep your name if you want, but I don't see a point in having 73 slightly differently worded BSD-like licenses in the core. > > I think we've covered before that 'uint' is not a standard data type. > > VARSIZE is of type int32 (signed). > > I have not seen this discussion. I used uint as simply handy > shortcut. When I want unsigned var, should it be 'uint32' or > simply 'unsigned'? Or should I avoid using unsigned vars? Why? (Might have been related to your digest module.) AFAIK, 'uint' isn't a standard type at all. You can use uint32 (BSD-style, also used by PostgreSQL) or uint32_t (C99, <inttypes.h>). -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: