Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.30.0106241355430.900-100000@peter.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Mark Volpe <volpe.mark@epa.gov>
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Re: [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Tom Lane writes: > Overall, the only objection I can see to doing things this way is that > we have to do it over again for each function language (eg, adding such > a thing to SQL functions is doable, but much more tedious than for > plpgsql). But it seems more flexible than the pg_proc-attribute > approach. Both approaches could be complementary, like they are in Unix as well. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления