Re: psql shell problem
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql shell problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105221739550.757-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql shell problem (Frank Bax <fbax@sympatico.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Denis A. Doroshenko writes: > please, be good and tell me why can't we use history _really found in > libreadline_, just because of some headers missing? if example proggie > using readline with history has been successfully compiled and linked, > with no headers, who cares about the header files? ISO 9899:1999 cares about the header files. In C99 you can't use a function without declaring it. Note that the test case in configure does declare the function in a phony way. > > What edition of readline does OpenBSD supply? > > heh, sounds weird, but i can't tell you :-) it seems to be readline > which comes with GNU binutils (version 2.9 for OpenBSD 2.8, AFAIK). All GNU readline releases and all readline-compatible NetBSD libedit releases provide a history.h header. If OpenBSD wants to create a new readline[-compatible] package that does not include a history.h file because it declares the history functions in readline.h then that's okay, but I need to know that this is the plan and not just an accident. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: