Re: Why do we use Tcl's compiler and flags?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why do we use Tcl's compiler and flags? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0105131207240.760-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why do we use Tcl's compiler and flags? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why do we use Tcl's compiler and flags?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > However, it doesn't appear to me that we'll get rid of all that much > cruft if we change. We'll still need to find and read tclConfig.sh > in order to find out such interesting things as which shlibs libtcl.so > is dependent on. Why are you concerned about fixing something that's > not especially broken? It *is* especially broken if the compiler referenced by TCL_CC does not exist on the system. This situation is not uncommon on commercial operating systems if the user did not shell out the extra cash for the vendor's compiler suite, but the vendor did provide a Tcl installation. We hear these bug reports once in a while, mostly from Solaris users. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: