Tom Lane writes:
> Okay. I've committed a configure check that tests to see whether a
> macro defined as above compiles, and if so it will be used (if we are
> using "long long" for int64). Hopefully the check will prevent breakage
> on machines where LL is not appropriate.
I don't see what this configure check buys us, since it does not check for
anything that's ever been reported not working. Do you think there are
platforms that have 'long long int' but no 'LL' suffix? That seems more
than unlikely.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/