Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.30.0103221714510.1208-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Larry Rosenman writes: > cc -G -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-h,libpsqlodbc.so.0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic info.o bind.o columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o environ.oexecute.o lobj.o misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o results.o socket.o parse.o statement.o gpps.o tuple.otuplelist.o dlg_specific.o -lm -Wl,-R/usr/local/pgsql/lib -o libpsqlodbc.so.0.26 > UX:ld: ERROR: psqlodbc.o: symbol: '_fini' multiply defined; also in file /usr/ccs/lib/crti.o > gmake[3]: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.26] Error 1 This is a known portability problem on Unixware (at least known to me) and probably other non-GCC setups. > Why do WE define _fini? Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: